Results
of a flash survey of sports teams from all over
the world
Montréal, 16 January 2004
- Since the unfortunate
outcome of the FGG's Chicago meeting last November,
Rendez-Vous Montréal 2006, has gone back to organising
and delivering the best ever Gay Sport and Cultural
Festival for the benefit of the GLBT World Community.
Our Board, our public and private
sponsors, have decided to fully support the Rendez-Vous
Montréal 2006 Organising Committee and thanks
to the interest of numerous GLBT sports teams
from around the world, the games will take place
in Montréal as scheduled. We no longer are looking
back, are not sour and are rather very optimistic
for the success of the event in 2006. We are simply
moving forward.
An Encouraging Survey
Results of a Flash survey of
sports teams from all over the world
19 December 2003 to 9 January
2004
Methodology
On 19 December 2003, the Montréal
2006 Marketing Communications Department sent
a mass mailing to 845 teams and sporting organizations
worldwide. The organizations that responded represent
13,603 members.
The survey had four questions
on the subject of developing an international
sports association for the GLBT community
Here is a summary of the results:
Question 1
Do you agree with the idea of
establishing a democratic, representative international
sporting association whose mission would be to
develop the gay and lesbian sport movement worldwide
and to offer tangible services to its members?
ANSWERS:
| Group
of respondents |
YES
|
NO
|
| Total respondents |
84.1% |
15.9% |
| Excluding individuals
|
79.6% |
20.4% |
| Local unique sports organizations
only |
83.3% |
16.7% |
| Other organizations |
75.3% |
24.7% |
It is interesting to note that
the vast majority of respondents would like to
see the establishment of a democratically-run
organization dedicated to the development of the
GLBT sporting movement and offering services to
members. This organization would also be responsible
for producing an event every four years and would
provide developmental support to GLBT sports teams.
These points are reflected in
the following questions.
Question 2
Please prioritize possible mandates
for this new organization from the following list:
- Developing GLBT sports through
a major international sporting event;
- Providing membership services
to local, national and continental sporting
organizations;
- Developing sporting organizations
(including clubs and teams) worldwide.
ANSWERS:
|
1st
Choice |
2nd
Choice |
3rd
Choice |
| Total respondents |
53.1% |
8.0% |
38.0% |
| Excluding individuals
|
51.3% |
10.0% |
37.5% |
| Local unique sports organizations
only |
40.9% |
4.4% |
52.2% |
| Other organizations |
64.7% |
17.7% |
17.7% |
|
1st
Choice |
2nd
Choice |
3rd
Choice |
| Total respondents |
20.4% |
48.0% |
32.0% |
| Excluding individuals
|
20.5% |
47.5% |
32.5% |
| Local unique sports organizations
only |
27.3% |
43.5% |
30.4% |
| Other organizations |
11.8% |
52.9% |
35.3% |
|
1st
Choice |
2nd
Choice |
3rd
Choice |
| Total respondents |
26.5% |
44.0% |
30.0% |
| Excluding individuals
|
28.2% |
42.5% |
30.0% |
| Local unique sports organizations
only |
31.8% |
52.2% |
17.4% |
| Other organizations |
23.5% |
29.4% |
47.6% |
Priorities varied according
to the type of organization. 84.0% of respondents
identified this as the priority, versus 52.9%
for other organizations. The results revealed
that local sports organizations clearly place
a higher priority on the development of new organizations.
For other organizations, it is more important
to develop the sporting movement by holding an
event every four years, compared with local sports
organizations (82.4% versus 45.3%). Providing
of services was a second choice for all types
of respondents. It is clear that the three points
raised in the survey are important for all existing
organizations, and target the developmental priorities
of the GLBT sporting movement.
Question 3
A series of eleven possible
types of services an association could provide
to its members were listed and respondents were
asked to rate each one according to its level
of importance. Ratings were given on a scale of
1 to 10, where 1 was "extremely important" and
10 was "not at all important".
ANSWER:
Here is the prioritization of
needs, in order, according to respondents. This
order takes into consideration the data collected
in Question 2:
1 - Organize a major international
GLBT sporting event every four years;
- 51.5% of all respondents
said that this was extremely important to them.
The level of consensus was very high amongst
most organizations. This is clearly the first
priority for most respondents.
2 - Provide expertise and resources
to develop new GLBT sporting team worldwide;
- All groups agree that this
is a priority and we are seeing the beginning
of a consensus on this point.
3 - Promote the various international,
continental and national organizations and their
activities;
- The promotion of different
events is also an important factor for respondents
in general.
4 - Assume coordination between
international, continental and national organizations;
- The coordination of different
organizational levels is also a priority for
most organizations other than local ones. We
can also see here the beginning of a consensus
on this issue.
5 - Manage and coordinate a
calendar of all key GLBT international sporting
events;
- Established organizations
had the strongest reaction to the idea of creating
and coordinating a calendar of events. It is
clear that this should be one of the priorities
of the new association.
6 - Work to promote the GLBT
sport movement in other sectors of society (mainstream
sports, political arena, media, etc.);
|